I know this probably isn't the best place to ask about this but im really desperate. So anyway i'm in my senior year in college and i'm writing my thesis which is disability discrimination in the workplace. My aim was to see if consumers attitude would increase after hiring disabled people, but my paper was focusing on the discrimination, the disability discrimination act (Laws), and the advantages and disadvantages of hiring disabled people. But my professor said that with the way may paper was going, it had nothing to do with consumers attitude and i should change the purpose of my paper. and i have no clue what to write. Can anyone help? if im writing about disability discrimination and writing about the laws of disability and the advantages and disadvantages of hiring disabled people, what would be the aim of the research.
>>9112918
It's the wrong board and the wrong website since it has no board for homework help.
If you can't figure out your problem, you also probably shouldn't go for a degree. Doesn't sound like you are studying anything worthwhile either.
That said, I have no idea what you mean by "increase consumers attitude". If you are researching disability discrimination and discrimination laws, then the aim of your research is to FIND OUT about the advantages and disadavantages. Once you have those, you can put a pretty bow on them but you're pretty much done.
>>9112941
Well it's HR so yeah i guess it isnt that important, i still want to graduate tho.
I already mentioned the advantages and disadvantages in the paper so it wouldn't make sense to make the aim finding out about them
>>9112941
i also don't think this is the wrong board, it's literature and im writing my thesis
The best thing to do in this situation is to ask for a more in-depth one-on-one conversation with your adviser, and either seek out other informal advisers or ask your own to recommend some. If you don't understand what he means by suggesting a major structural change in your paper, clearly something's not on track. Either you're not seeing the forest for the trees, or he's not seeing how the trees you see add up to the forest you're suggesting.
>>9112967
Actually bitch go to worksafe requests
Also, repulsion to sick and non functional members of our species is as biologically hard wired as the vomitting your psuedo-fecal paternalistic whining should also trigger within you. I will say something positve though. Your idea is actually pretty good in the sense that you've somehow managed to make it distinguishable from excrement long enough for me to hold off a gagging uncontrollably till my stomach is as empty as a retail space patronisingly adorned with jittering, wobbling, genetic b-sides.
>>9112918
Use Jstor and oxfordbibliographies
http://oxfordbibliographiesonline.com/view/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0303.xml?rskey=hw7lLx&result=1&q=ableism#firstMatch
Davis, Lennard J. “Constructing Normalcy.” In The Disabilities Studies Reader. 3d ed. Edited by Lennard J. Davis, 3–19. New York: Routledge, 2010.
E-mail Citation »
Illustrates how the idea of the normal that emerged in 19th-century industrial societies gave rise to a general notion of the disabled body and eugenic programs for preventing disability.
stuff like this, rotate some keywords around.