Underated gem filled with facts and red pills or just some deluded kike drivel
General opinions on this?
>>9106541
>red pill
>deluded kike drivel
in my opinion
>>9106541
For some reason this book is despised here. Even if the author is totally wrong, I enjoyed the parts of the book about the search in monastaries for hidden works of classic knowledge and the vatican political aspects.
I feel like main thesis was not well proven though, but it did get me to read lucretius.
>>9106559
It has some major truth bombs and the autor is a jew
Both points stand
Deluded kike drivel.
Never trust a Jew writing about the Christian civilization of the Middle Ages. They have too emotional baggage about it to be objective.
>>9106586
That's kind of true for any author writing on any subject though isn't it
>>9106586
Yeah, that's my main issue with it, the book is filled with 'they came after the jews' horsecrap
>>9106590
Most can hold it and treat their subject in an objective manner, Jews simply can't. They are too neurotic and paranoid for that.
>>9106606
I'm willing to believe that
>>9106541
just read lucretius
>>9106606
Simon Sebag Montefiore, Norman Finkelstein, Hannah Arendt.
>>9106617
Not really my thing, I like the concept of the Swerve though