These people are really retarded Aside from the fact that its

>>9100502
Yeah because /lit/ is so above that where we just call each other cucks and /pol/tards and fedoras

>>9100502
>implying there's isn't "why holden is so dum" thread on /lit/ every other day
>wah wah there's some stupid people being collectively stupid on the internet
Fug off and stop shitting up this board.

>>9100510
shut up nigger

were above it in that were not an entire board dedicated to shallow, circle jerking critiques of good writers

>>9100514
>>implying there's isn't "why holden is so dum" thread on /lit/ every other day
there /lit/erally isnt

What is the point of this thread? Fuck off and die. Sage.

>>9100519
>were not an entire board dedicated to shallow, circle jerking critiques of good writers
Yes we are. That is exactly what lit is.

R literature is actually bad literature

/r/badphilosophy master race

>>9100519
>there /lit/erally isnt
Not every other day, but every time there is a thread on the book that criticism comes out.

File: images (13).jpg (13KB, 381x386px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 381x386px

>reddit
>retarded
Yeah no shit

Visiting /r/badliterature is a great way to realise just how much worse /lit/ could be.

You faggots
>>9100510
>>9100514
>>9100541
have no idea.

>>9100690
lmao you think that's bad?

https://www.reddit.com/r/RedPillLit/

>>9100757
That's just stupid.

>>9100502
Catcher in the Rye sucks though. That's a completely legitimate criticism.

Everybody knows that Sallinger's short stories are where it's at.

>>9100769
>That's a completely legitimate criticism

>calling a book bad because of the intentionally unlikable main character
>legitimate criticism

>>9100571
that's also gay