I was wondering, does there exists a branch of linguistic philosophy

World is a word.

>>9090603
Hermeneutics my friend.

>>9090603
Pragmatism, beginning of course with Peirce, who is based as fuck.

Saussure and the structuralists developed independently of Wittgenstein.

Heidegger is there but didn't write that much on language in Being & Time itself. There's the thing that Derrida read the structuralists and Heidegger, never really read Wittgenstein but managed to get similar conclusions to the late W.

After the Linguistic Turn, all philosophy is heavily invested in language, no matter the tradition, but the conclusions appear similar enough to the point that even the neopragmatists, of all people, would read Heidegger and Derrida, and also Wittgenstein again.

>>9090693
Thanks. All of this looks promising.

Are you joking? Most analytic philosophy is different from 2nd Wittgenstein.

>>9090656
Hermeneutics isn't a school of thought you retard

>>9092458
It is a valid method though.