What to read after Debord? Any worthy successors or contemporary

Tried Vaneigem?

>>9086476
Marshall McLuhan

>>9086482
A little bit, but was unimpressed. Seems like a worse Deleuze/Guattari.

24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep by Crary is an ok follow-up desu

>>9086607
shit book desu

>>9086609
ok

Stiegler, Jameson and Lasch then

Baudrillard

>>9086635
And Christopher Lasch

>>9086476
There's the rest of the french ultraleft — Jacques Camatte, Gilles Dauve, Roland Simon.

>>9086607
Read it, not bad but kind of disappointing. I guess it's already been said by Debord.

>>9086638
>>9086616
Lasch is pretty damn based.

>>9086635
What's his best? System of Objects? Screened Out?

>>9086484
>>9086635
>>9086638
>DeBord
>McLuhan
>Baudrillard
>Lasch

These all seem to fit together naturally.

>>9086865
>What's his best?

Probably Simulacra and Simulation, but I recommend starting with The Jean Baudrillard Reader, edited by Steve Redhead. Gives you the breadth of Baudrillard's output, which is highly varied, so that you can see how his thought developed, and then pick whatever is most interesting to you.

Anselm Jappe

>>9086885
Except McLuhan is garbage and pretty much the opposite of Debord.

>>9086476
https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/preliminary-materials-theory-young-girl

>>9087432
Looks interesting. Although Tiqqun seem edgy as fuck.

>>9087600
it's p dece supp/complementary material
tiqqun were p edgy yea

>>9086607

So what exactly is late capitalism? I see this term thrown around like some kind of magic talisman, and no one ever elaborates or questions.

>>9086476
Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the 20th Century (1989) Greil Marcus

>>9087629
I've heard good things about this book, even though I don't really appreciate punk.

>>9087619
Capitalism after "Fordism" probably. It could easily just be called post-Fordist capitalism, but they like to imply capitalism is dying, therefore we will look upon this era as latter capitalism, or "late capitalism."

>>9087298
>videogames are garbage and the opposite of board games

>>9086865
I loved culture of narcissism by Lasch

>>9089828
I'm quoting Debord here. He sees Mcluhan as an apologist for the spectacle, only to latter realize that the "global village" is not good and needs to be moderated.

Debord hated Mcluhan.

>political
>science

>>9090653
Care to share the source?
Macluhan believed from the start that electronic media would make people less intelligent. Of course he did not fight the spectacle like Debord did, but to say that Mcluhan was an apologist for the spectacle is misinformed. He did profit from it academically but was essentially critical of it.