>mfw an athiest thinks there's actually any argument

He didn't prove God. He only showed that there has to be some point where logic starts.

There's a huge leap from that to deism, and there's an even bigger leap from that to theism, let alone Christianity.

File: Steve-091113--01.jpg (36KB, 620x372px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 620x372px

>>9083685
>this is what athiests think a refutation is

Don't talk about the Summa unless you've actually fucking read it

>>9083692
How about you try to correct the anon then? Do you know how conversation works?

>>9083692
This is not an argument faggot. Actually argue against what I said or fuck off.

>>9083700
>>9083705
So fucking what? Is this an argument? No.

Neither of you have disproved Aquinas so I'm still right.

>>9083679
kys

None of the five ways are sound arguments

File: ys.jpg (20KB, 615x344px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 615x344px

>>9083772
actually refute one then

>faith
>arguments

Way to expose yourself, idiot

>>9083800
Well aren't you a dumb dummy dum dum, huh? Huh?

>>9083679
I'm a theist, but I haven't read Aquinas. What is the proof that he uses?

Atheists are literally getting BTFO on /lit/ right now.

>>9083832
1) God by nature
2) Thus by Nature, God

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-02-09 08:46:25 Post No.9083869
[Report]

Anonymous ## Mod 2017-02-09 08:46:25 Post No.9083869 [Report]

This thread was moved to >>>/his/2340436