>thinks Plato, Hume and Kant had reasonable theories about

I read "Hume" as "Harambe" lol

It is unreasonable, as it depends upon a communication of divine attributes to Christ's human nature to the degree that he is rendered non-human. If a "human body" is non-finite and essentially omnipresent, then it isn't a body and it isn't human. There are better ways of understanding the Eucharist.

>>9075974
Hah!

>thinks anybody cares about his babby metaphysics
>thinks posting frogs is cool
If this describes you, you should kys

>>9075980
>uses kys
If you do this, you should probably neck yoursef.

>>9075974
LOL

>>9075978
100% human and divine at the same time

>>9075988
Chalcedon states that the two natures are not "confused." Real presence requires a confusion of the two natures.

>>9075974
LMAO

>>9075988

Explain how this makes sense in any way other than "if it's not true my belief system doesn't work so it's true"

>>9075974 >>9075979 >>9075983 >>9076741
all me

>>9075991
No it doesn't. They're both distinct, but both are also present through mystery.