Has anyone here ever learned anything or engaged in a meaningful discussion about books on this board, ever? I've lurked and posted occasionally for maybe a year. In that time, I've had one short discussion about Infinite Jest that made me reconsider my distaste for it. I almost had a conversation about Henry James once before the thread imploded into pompous shitheads talking in empty, holier-than-thou greentexts. But those two instances aside, I don't think I've ever seen any meaningful content here. Even the attempts at expression boil down to vapid non-statements like ">tfw doesn't know Witty BTFO the Neech" or "Pynchon > Tennyson." Do you all do anything but guzzle redpills, ogle patrician stacks and mutter cliches based on what wikipedia says about Harold Bloom?
It's a serious question. I'd say put the hyperbole aside, but I'm not speaking in hyperbole.
Second question: When you inevitably answer that /lit/ is a cesspool of illiterates who haven't yet realized that postures mean nothing when the poser isn't seen, where do you go to discuss literature with people who actually read?
Gotta move to discord or something
>it took him a year to realize that 90% of anything is shit including 4chan and /lit/
Hide the retarded threads and you should be fine.
>>9073336
Is there a better community out there?
Other than, I guess, that private tracker for books. Their forums might be nice, but I've never seen them
>>9073778
the most active private forum is bibliotik, and it is heavily HEAVILY moderated
>>9073789
>HEAVILY moderated
So then it's shit, isn't it? What can you get banned for?
>>9073808
Annoying the moderators with views or posting.
Goodreads, and its more patrician cousin librarything are good I guess since you build your own community. reddit is reddit.
This is the best desu
I am here for recommendations and to joke and meme around with people who have similar interests.