Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1486275337444.jpg (54KB, 622x621px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 622x621px
>"Do the ancients think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"Yes and no. You see, it's very complicated.."'
>"Do Christians think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"God either hates you and no, or God appears at every moment to will your act to be free but it's still mostly not free, but that's freedom. You see, it's very complicated.."
>"Does Hegel think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"For Hegel, the problem of free will is simply avoided. You see, it's very complicated.."
>"Does Kant think non-compatibilist free will exists"
>"You see, it's very complicated.."
>"Do modern philosophers think non-compatibilist free will exist"
>"No, b-but compatibilism is just as good!! Y-you see, it's very complicated.."
>>
That's one pale pussy.
>>
>>9067555
>"Do Christians think non-compatibilist free will exists"
What do you want to hear exactly? The scriptural answer is "no."
>>
>>9067555
Wtf is non-compatibalist free will you fucking asshole
>>
>>9067555
How do people even justify compatibilism? .
>>
>>9068491
The argument goes something like this:
>B-but I FEEL like I have free will!
>>
>>9067602
completely incorrect you disgusting lutheran scum
>>
>>9068491
you just argue that free will and determinism are consistent. you then have three options:
1. freewill is possible but for some reason doesnt exist in our world (but it could have done so)
2. freewill does exist in our world but humans do not have it (maybe aliens/ god)
3. humans have freewill
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1