>be Italian >costantly study overlords Dante, Petrarca

Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments. Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove.
O no! it is an ever-fixed mark
That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wand'ring bark,
Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
Within his bending sickle's compass come;
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error and upon me prov'd,
I never writ, nor no man ever lov'd.

>>9050696
>Why is he so highly regarded?

He was really, really, really clever. Like that 0.00000001% of humanity who's so smart that he just utterly BTFO everyone else.

http://shakespeare-online.com/biography/wordsinvented.html
http://www.pathguy.com/shakeswo.htm
>He invented over 1700 of our common words by changing nouns into verbs, changing verbs into adjectives, connecting words never before used together, adding prefixes and suffixes, and devising words wholly original.

It's hard to get across if you're not a native English speaker, but he single-handedly invented an expansion pack for the English language, and all the stuff he made up is still in use to this day both in English literature and common street talk.

Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate.
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer’s lease hath all too short a date.
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimmed;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance, or nature’s changing course, untrimmed;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow’st,
Nor shall death brag thou wand’rest in his shade,
When in eternal lines to Time thou grow’st.
So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.

>>9050701
>love
>remove

>come;
>doom.

>prov'd,
>lov'd.

How were these rhymes pronounced at the time?

>>9050724
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPlpphT7n9s

>>9050724
Read it as if you're a farrrrmer.

>>9050696
>Why is he so highly regarded?
Because the British and provincial as fuck and will grasp at any halfway decent author.

>>9050728
ty

>>9050774
FUCKING THIS. FUCKING THISSSSSSS!

FUCK UK

>>9050696
classico?

>>9050774
>world's largest empire and most widely spoken language
>provincial

>>9050780
>largest empire

That would be the French Empire

>most widely spoken language

That would be Chinese

Fuck off Anglo piece of shit

Dante è molto migliore che Shakespeare, cazzo!

t. ammiratore di Dante E di Shakespeare

(Just kidding. They are equals. Start with the Tempest, As You Like It, and the Sonnets. Shakespeare was a giant. I wouldn't be what I am without his works. Also, perdonate mi italiano.)

>>9050774
This tbqh.

I've realized a anglophone pattern of overhyping authors (some of them even good ones) to the point it becomes obnoxious and probably drives people away from them.

Authos like Hemmingway, Dickens, Twain and Shakespeare get memed so much it becomes kinda sickening. I mean, Shakespeare is pretty good, one of the GOATS, no discussion here, but if we take the "foundational works", Shakespeare will lose to every other author (Cervantes, Rabelais, Dante, etc.)

>>9050780
> muh numbers
This is what I mean by being provincial. If you had any decency or shame or perspective you'd let your art stand or fall by its own merits, and not grasp at muh appeals to imaginary dicksize.

>>9050783
>shakespeare is pretty good
>one of the GOATs

Retard foreigners

>>9050783
Dante is shit tbqh

File: Screenshot_2017-02-02-13-00-05.png (125KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 720x1280px

>>9050781
You're not even trying.

>>9050787
Dante, while not as great as French, is still better than anglo, overhyped trash like Shakespeare. It sickens me people think Shakespeare is the greatest, when that belongs to the French. Fuck you if you think any Anglo shit is worth my attention.

>>9050791
It's you who mixed up the time periods by claiming both largest empire and largest language.

Back when Britain had the largest empire, they did not have the largest language. And, now that "they" (it's Americans) have the largest language, the French have the largest empire (kind-of-but-not-really).

>>9050793
>Dante, while not as great as French, is still better than anglo, overhyped trash like Shakespeare.

Absolutely wrong. Shakespeare's influence over writers (non-"anglos" included) is immense. Also some of the best non-Western writers are watered-down versions of the best the West has to offer. (Rushdie is discount Pynchon, in case you haven't read Midnight's Children.) The rest of the world offers "post-colonialism" and "magical realism" which are two of the greatest cop outs imaginable, in my personal opinion.

>>9050774
Don't be stupid. Every society grasps at any halfway decent author. Even >>9050783 shows that, with his instant assumption that we are talking about Anglophones in general.

In any case: this is partially why Shakespeare is so hyped. But only partially. Shakespeare is a legitimately great playwright, which is why the British could advocate for him so easily -- but don't forget they had to find Shakespeare first. He was by no means hyped until a bunch of faggots in the eighteenth century raved about him.

In any case, it's stupid to think acclaim has any relation to quality. Judge him on his own merits.

>>9050696
You'll be disappointed. You have tons of writers superior to him.

>>9050783
What do you mean? Shakespeare, Milton, and Keats are equals of Dante and Cervantes, as far as I'm concerned... I do not comment about Chaucer, sinceI have only read a few bits, because his language is difficult for me.

However, I must say I agree about authors like Hemingway and Mark Twain. I don't see how they can be considered as great as Americans will deem them to be. Same applies for authors such as William Carlos Williams, ee cummings, Saul Bellow, and others. As a Brazilian, I can cite a few Portuguese and Brazilian authors who seem to me to be quite superior to them, and who have much less fame: Fernão Lopes (definitely superior), Antônio Vieira (definitely superior), Almeida Garrett, Eça de Queiroz, Antônio Lobo Antunes (definitely superior), João Guimarães Rosa (definitely superior). If I remember correctly, the great poet Robert Lowell, after he read Euclides da Cunha's Os Sertões, said the book was better than War and Peace...

The source of the problem is that people tend to have a higher regard for the authors they themselves have read and, since Hemingway and Twain wrote in English, their works attract much more readers and, therefore, much more admirers. Almost all writers of the world know English. How many of them know Portuguese or Korean, however? Very few, so they have to rely on translations. This is particularly unfortunate for Portuguese, because poetry is, by far and far and far, our greatest strength in literature. If you think Saramago is a great genius, as Harold Bloom does, I have to inform you our language has produced at least ten poets, if not more, who are better than him (and I love Saramago). The problem is that they don't have many translators, much less good ones...

File: A Grain of Wheat.png (550KB, 500x775px) Image search: [Google]

550KB, 500x775px

>>9050798
>he rest of the world offers "post-colonialism" and "magical realism"

>yeah that's a pretty good realist novel you wrote
>unfortunately, due to the time and place it covers, it can be described by this phrase that can be put in scarequotes so it doesn't count

>>9050810
Could you rephrase that? I'm afraid you aren't making any sense.

>>9050812
>Could you rephrase that?
Yes.
>you aren't making any sense
Wrong.

>>9050797
I didn't say anything about time periods. That was all in your tiny head. The British had the largest Empire. They have the most widely spoken language. Or is that the Chinese? You can't seem to decide which alternative facts you're arguing.

I don't think monoglots can really weigh in on the matter.

>>9050819
>you
My friend, I am merely another anon who saw the autism and was compelled to jump in.

The British had the largest empire a century after Shakespeare became famous, and they had the largest language two centuries after Shakespeare became famous. Your points are therefore irrelevant.

However, England's never really had trouble with literary fame. Even when it was some shitty backwater in the medieval period, French (chivalric) Romanticists were cumming buckets about it.

File: a6bd5172452730877a6adc84c0b6dcaf.jpg (21KB, 400x386px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x386px

>>9050817

>>9050824
The autism is you not being able to understand what's meant by "Largest empire and most widely spoken language".

>>9050827
...Are you saying they DID have the largest empire and most spoken language in the early-mid 1700s?

>>9050831
I'm saying you have autism.

>>9050835
Do you know where you are?

>>9050835
Great comeback! Much wit.

Though ’tis no wisdom to confess so much
Unto an enemy of craft and vantage,
My people are with sickness much enfeebled,
My numbers lessened, and those few I have
Almost no better than so many French,
Who when they were in health, I tell thee, herald,
I thought upon one pair of English legs
Did march three Frenchmen. Yet, forgive me, God,
That I do brag thus. This your air of France
Hath blown that vice in me. I must repent.

Henry V - Act 3, Scene 6

Fucking beautiful.

>>9050841
In the jungle?

>>9050854
If here is anything, it's a mildly run-down car park.

>>9050844
Great play

>>9050728
#fathersongoals