Can anyone give me an attempt at summarizing Being in Time?

*Being AND Time

Sorry, long day.

>>9030271
There's a more fundamental human understanding of being before analysis of concepts such as gravity or predicates.

>>9030271
Being in the world, always already, presence and absence, truth as revealing, thinking as a path, and fuck everyone who tried doing philosophy this is my national socialist swaggggg and I'm not gonna make this any easier cuz that would be like suicide and anyway it's much easier to say it like this.

>>9030443
Heidegger later rejects the notion that truth is revealing (aletheia), which is explicated in Sein und Zeit.

"Being in Time" (1927) (or "Sein und Zeit", SZ) is Heidegger's philosophical magnum opus and represents his first actual major publication (the book is actually only 1/3 finished, with the other 2/3 becoming the substance of later lectures/books) marking the "early Heidegger phase".
It follows the phenomenological method fathered by Edmund Husserl (H's mentor), but it differs from Husserl's in that H's phenomenology is hermeneutic (as opposed to Husserl's transcendental phenomenology). H's phenomenology is more descriptive and intent on interpretation, while Husserl is dealing with a scientific exactitude on the plains of mathematics. H believes that we must first begin a "hermeneutic of facticty", which is he wants to make an interpretation about the Being (Sein, thought of not as an entity, but instead a relation) of Dasein (Being-there, human beings). In explicating (through analysis) Dasein's existential structure we are supposed to find the "nature" of the way things really are (for example, we are "always-already" "being-in-the-world [in-der-welt-sein], we always are engaged and act in a world of meaning as human agents). We are also supposed to be able to eventually "ask the question of Being" which will lead us into the "right way of thinking" (this thought is supposedly non-ontotheological, or metaphysical, in the later Heidegger). These are all very basic semi-lucid explanations of a very interesting, fascinating, and helpful (but ultimately sometimes rather simple) figure in the history in philosophy.

>>9030766
>very interesting, fascinating, and helpful (but ultimately sometimes rather simple) figure in the history in philosophy
You mean the most important figure in twentieth century philosophy, right? It was impossible to do philosophy for a while after Heidegger without commenting on him in one way or another.

the being of being is inside of its being

If you had to choose between these 5 ontologies, which would you pick?
>Greek Metaphysics
>Cartesian Objects
>Monopsychism
>Phenomenology
>Post-Structuralism

>>9030851
Phenomenology.

>>9030851
>Greek Metaphysics
thales's? fuk ye

File: DFW-animorph.jpg (54KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x360px

>>9030867
forgot pic

>>9030867
>not Parminedes

>>9030851
>Greek Metaphysics/Panpsychism
All is mind
>Cartesian Objects/Dualism
All is mind and body
>Monopsychism
All is one mind
>Phenomenology
All is structured consciousness
>Post-structuralism
All is interpretation

can someone help me understand all of these things?

>>9030851
>greek metaphysics
There's like 10 of them
>Thales'
>Heraclitus'
>Anaximander's
>Plato's
>Aristotle's
>Stoic
>Epicurean
>Plotinus'

>>9030879
send me nudes right now

File: aftergymnasion.jpg (39KB, 410x800px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 410x800px

>>9030885

>>9030891
T-thanks

>>9030271
>Can anyone give me an attempt at summarizing Being in Time?

"All existence is necessarily finite. Things come from nothing and return to nothing. I'm Atheist but spiritual. There can never be AI."

feels > reals

ergo

feels = reals

>>9030271
fuck u plato

A secularisation Guénon. A rational proof of God and the eternity of the soul.

File: heidegger-well.jpg (162KB, 800x1082px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 800x1082px

this is a real dumbed-down retarded versoin

ever since descartes philosophers have divided the world into two types of being: subject (mind) and object (substance)
some philosophers after him emphasize the mind, some substance, some come up with ways to bridge them together but heidegger says fuck this framework
there are more than these two types of being:

1. ready to hand (how we see and use things in everyday life without theorizing about it like scientists)

2. presence at hand (substance or a special case of looking at things like a scientist usually when the ready to hand way of looking at things breaks down)

3. dasein (human with all of his or her emotions, thinking, instincts, spirituality, desires, memories and most importantly how they get meaning in their lives)

and he goes into the details of how they're related and how it functions and how things are disclosed to us and how we relate to death and all sorts of other stuff

then after being and time there is a turn in his thinking
more types of being that are historically dependent, like eras of a dominant way of viewing the world
he thinks today the common way of viewing the world today is the technological mode of being
we basically see everything as a standing reserve of energy to exploit, including people
he wants to go back to a more romantic, idyllic, nature-focused way of viewing things (similar to walden or emerson's essay on nature)
at first he thought nazism would bring germany back to it but over time he grew disillusioned and pessimistic and thinks we might be fucked and there is no going back

>>9031598
>A rational proof of God and the eternity of the soul
How can there even be such a thing? Not fedoraing, I swear, just trying to understand.

YOU. CANT. KNOW. NUFFIN.

And deconstruct the history of the western tradition.

>>9031700
>at first he thought nazism would bring germany back to it but over time he grew disillusioned and pessimistic and thinks we might be fucked and there is no going back

What's that? Thinking in German doesn't make you more open the unconcealment of Being??? What's that? The Nazis were technophiles with technology 50 years ahead of the Allies?

Looks like language isn't the house of Being after all.

I want to punch Heidegger in the face for ever, EVER, implying German is a better language than French.

>>9030871
Is that a real quote? Cuz that's hilarious.

File: 1480728078079.jpg (436KB, 1280x851px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 1280x851px

>>9030271
Heidegger want's to understand existence (what it is to be) and argues that metaphysics is not the way to go because it focuses on things outside of man. Heidegger focuses narrowly on man and how he experiences himself and the world, and hopes that by starting a foundation of understanding what it means to exist as man, he will later understand existence.

>>9031700
Dumbed down but very helpful.

>>9030271
"Burn the Jews"

Nazi stuff.

File: 1455936865459.png (230KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 640x360px

>>9030879

>forgetting Parmenides
>implying Plotinus' metaphysic wavers even one quanta from Plato's

>>9030271
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxulNGUUQm4

>>9035047
nice.

>>9031700
>ever since Descartes

But this is wrong.

>How can I reconcile my political ideology being BTFO by reality?

You can understand why Marxists seized on his works after the fall of the USSR.

>>9031700
Oh god. I continued to read this.

Maybe this is helpful if you're going to just flip through B&T to see what the first part of the first division is about. But this is such a shallow reading and summary, it's ultimately not helpful if you really want to know Heidegger and his thinking.

Don't take this post as definitive or accurate. It mentions some things he discusses, but ultimately you should just read the goddamn book. Heidegger writes extremely well and in a clear manner if you're patient enough.

File: when the dasein drops.jpg (153KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 640x360px

>>9035047
I needed this

>>9031700
His complain in dualism dates from Plato. His analysis on Descartes is due that different from Plato's metaphisycs, Descartes provides a method in which science would propose the validation of truth. This truth concerns Heidegger's ideas due to the anthropologic and sociologic studies that arise in the late XIX century and are recurrant in XX century sciences of spirit, this conformation of humanity as a concept validated by scientific method seems to trivialice human existence and the possibility of philosophy external to scientific legitimacy.

But, then again, the dualism and the critique of absolute truth, for Heidegger, is a norm imposed by platonist thought.

I recommend Heidegger's essay "The Age of the World Picture" to clear this. But I think this anon's resume is actually good.

>>9030271
What happens if we take time seriously?

>>9035047
amazing

>>9030288
not bad yo

>>9030851


Phenomenology isn't an ontology. It's a method.

>>9030271

>Can anyone give me an attempt at summarizing Being in Time?

Jews are literally machines.

>>9038474
This explains that new cartoon with a character called Jewbot.

>>9031063
>There can never be AI
Hubert Dreyfus detected

>>9032442
>I want to punch Heidegger in the face for ever, EVER, implying German is a better language than French.

Which would be worse for history, if Germany never existed or France?

>>9038409
>What happens if we take time seriously?
Time is mostly most seriously measured in relation to how much money can be garnered from smallest unit of time multiplied by active/potential energy times speed of light squared, hbar epsilon 3 manifold functional space with real local complex integer numbers substanoidaly distinct in non trivial domains at the junction of the hoffmeyer conjecture and the Himann thesis, from beta anaylsis, at least within a standard deviation of 7x10^-2.1555506

>>9037013
>after the fall of the USSR
they didn't wait until the '90s to do that

File: 1.jpg (210KB, 500x833px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 500x833px

>>9039565
Dude, what if I told you there exists robots that think like Heidegger?

>>9030878
>Post-structuralism
>all is interpretation.
No.

>>9030878
None of this is accurate or sufficiently descriptive as to be useful.

>>9035047
I think this changed my life.