Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: Portrait_of_Friedrich_Nietzsche.jpg (222KB, 600x696px) Image search:
[Google]
222KB, 600x696px
>Be Nietzsche in Universe-2
>be born in 1970
>get rejected by my soulmate in my mid '20s
>start writing furiously gold philosophy
>publish Also Sprach Zarathustra (it's the same as our ASZ, but there's a scene with a train)
>decide to drop LSD
>realize that I was just building my entire life and personality on a non-existant made up narrative
>realize that there is no personality
>realize that rationality is more effective than intuition
>realize that a scientific approach to philosophy is more effective than a poetic one
>become a pseudo-buddhist
>open a podcast
>tfw you're Sam Harris now
>>
>be ben stiller lookalike
>cling to positivism like a drowning man clinging to driftwood
>earn plaudits on reddit for it
>tfw you're Sam Harris now
>>
>>9023756
What's wrong with positivism and why are the humanities often hostile to it?
>>
Why did you employ the Kantian notions of "reason" and "intuition" in the contrary way to their usage by Kant? Isn't reason the speculative faculty of the mind, whereas intuition denotes whatever is to apprehended by the senses?
My dear sir, are you an idiot? Did you not realise that Nietzsche's epistemology is "ego-death" WRIT LARGE? The basis of his "perspectivism" and "experimentality" is the critique of the Cartesian and Kantian auto-reflexive "I-am-I". Friedrich says from the existence of a cogito only cogitationes could ever be inferred, which means thoughts are derived from thinking, but these thoughts cannot necessarily be predicated of a "self" or an "I" as their emanations or attributes.
>>
>>9023915
Well for starters, it's self-defeating in a way that most 14 year olds are actually capable of identifying.
>>
>>9023915
It's destroying civilisation. Also, it's wrong.
>>
>>9023915
>What's wrong with positivism and why are the humanities often hostile to it?
Because "hurr durr only scientific truth is true" literally causes nihilism in people.
>>
>>9023915
because https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verificationism
>...is the philosophical doctrine that only statements that are empirically verifiable (ie. verifiable through the senses) are cognitively meaningful.
but this is mostly an issue with logical positivism
>>
>>
>>9023756
>sam
>positivist
kek
>>
>>9023739
I laffd
Good job anon
>>
File: 552469.png (68KB, 700x700px) Image search:
[Google]
68KB, 700x700px
>>9024849
It's more like it destroy the thatness of humanity. It puts an ideal outside of it to strive for, *alien*ating it. It makes people foreign to everything around themselves.
>>
>>9025076
Not unlike Stirner's Egoism anon?
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2