Why is there always a kid in a philosophy class who rambles incoherently

File: 1444980112453.jpg (356KB, 1858x1204px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1858x1204px

Why is there always a kid in a philosophy class who rambles incoherently for several minutes straight using jargon that he does not understand and a vocal majority acts impressed by this charlatan? For instance a kid in my class today began talking about non empirical propositions, backed up his argument using empirical propositions, started talking about incompleteness theorem, and then finished with some musings on "metaphysical idealism". After this most of class acted as if Kant was lecturing in the room himself. I guess this is a rant thread. Post your rants. Charts too