Can anyone provide me with a rebuttal of the Sartrian perspective

>>8946504
Pseud, the thread. Did you even read Sartre? How did you come to this conclusion?

>>8946504
the rebuttal is easy: stop being an edgy teenager. nobody takes existentialism seriously in real life

>>8946504
The man in your pic related looks like he's cozy 24/7, and i respect that. I hope one day to rise to his level of coziness

It's been a while since I read Sartre, all I remember is
>Hey Sartre, should I go to war or stay home and take care of my mother? Is there a morally right answer?
>lol I dunno, you have to decide for yourself
>But how should I decide?
>lol I dunno
>Should I choose whichever I care about most, my mother or my country?
>whichever one you choose is ipso facto the one you care about most. btw, whatever you choose you're saying that everyone in the world should value the same things as you.
>But what if I'm not?
>You are.
Seems pretty fucking useless unless I'm being retarded and misinterpreting/remembering everything wrong, which I probably am.

>>8946841
I do, but only partially. I take all his philosophy of engagement and free will into account in my own life. And then I find that he's not so good when it comes to specific questions, he's like "yo we're free of every other meaning, the human only exist and its true essence is bullshit" but then he never specified all that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7l9g89xJgs

File: 220px-Kierkegaard.jpg (13KB, 220x326px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 220x326px

I don't care about that pedo rapist stalinist. Kierkegaard is better anyway.

>>8947085
top lel