Why read Kafka's novels if they're all uncompleted? It'd make more sense to simply read his short stories, instead.
because the people who publish them need money
>>8935222
his short stories are a million times better anyway
>>8935230
Which one is your all-time favorite?
>>8935238
On parables, Unhappiness, Poseidon, The Great Wall of China, and The Hunger Artsit. Not in any particular order but On Parables has a special place
>>8935244
Good list.
Mine is "The Bucket Rider." Check it out:
http://www.slideserve.co.uk/franz-kafka-the-bucket-rider
>>8935262
Yea this is some prime Kafka alright, I've never read this one before. I can't stand anyone who says his prose is either bad or gets lost in translation, this is some incisive shit.
>>8935309
Thanks, friend.
>>8935222
Some people say their lack of completion makes it more kafkaesque
>>8935222
WHY DID YOU READ THEM???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
>>8935419
What?
>>8935318
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaWgRw78Y1M
>>8935222
The idea of a book ever being completed is an act of illusion. A book begins then after a certain amount of pages it is over. The same goes for Kafka's books as any other.
>>8935222
Because they're worth reading, and they don't feel incomplete actually. It could digress on and on, and it wouldn't be better.
>>8935481
That's a nice satire of something a vapid pseud would say, anon, good one.
>>8935481
>
>>8935529
>tfw Donald Barthelme is a vapid pseud