Is there a literature prize like pic relatedbig book prizethat actually awards more traditionalist/literary works rather than political ones dictated by the authors gender or race in the spirit of inclusivity?
>>8931378
no, any award that gives first prize to that of a non-white or non-male or non-heterosexual is degenerate. Face it, were simply oppressed
>>8931388
Having read Beatty's The Sellout, The Vegetarian, and having made my way through the shortlists of Man Booker, Pulitzerlol, and National Book list for the few years, a political bias is obvious. Cervantes less so, much less so, but of course translation is a problem.
>>8931402
Can you name a winner of one of the biggest awards who were deserving of it despite being the wrong gender or race?
protip: stop caring about awards
>>8931421
I only use them as recommendation sources. I would not have heard of Laurus otherwise, or Svetlana Alexeivich or Mo Yan or Orhan Pamuk or Gao Xingjian , or Marlon James. I am about to read Eileen, and it looks pretty solid.
That said, this year's man booker and commonwealth winners and shortlists were for the most part obvious political statements, and I hate that shit. I dont care if they are "the wrong x" as long as they have great books.
It isnt out of some bizarre obsession with the awards themselves.
>>8931438
Oh okay. Sadly, I can't help you.