>that fucking endless tedious rant by the drunk retired official

>>8918597
we gonna go on for 150 posts about how dostoevsky is boring again?

>>8918612
he is p boring tho

>>8918613
Maybe stick to Marvel films champ

>>8918597
Raskolnikov will find this man again, and he speaks significantly less then, thanks to a trolley car.

I kinda liked it. I saw the scene quite vividly, and felt a sort of 'pull' as Marmeladov continues his rant, almost like if it was to be put on film we would start with full shots of the bar and gradually progress towards a close up shot of Semyon's face as his spills all this to Rasky. It's actually one of the parts of the book I remember most vividly.

>>8918616
lel

>>8918597
Serious question. How can I not be sure that everything that happens to Raskolnikov wasn't a dream.

I mean, he was delusional for practically the entire novel and mistaked dreams for reality at least once. How can I even be sure that the murder wasn't just a dream caused by his fever and delirium?

>>8918650
You can't, but it's fiction anyways. Doesn't matter if it was a dream or not since nothing actually happened.

>>8918681
>nothing actually happened.
So you're saying i'm correct?

>>8918701
What if the whole plot was a figment of Dostoyevski's imagination?

>>8918722
What if Dostoevsky is still alive?

the whole book was tedious desu

>>8918597
>>8918613
>>8918762
Pseuds