ITT: unpopular /lit/ opinions
>free verse is not real poetry, it's just vapid commentary with odd line spacing
>most authors who try to put some sort of political/social/identitarian message in their work are hacks who rely more on trends in public opinion than actual literary merit to sell copies
>e-readers are a passing fad
>there hasn't been a worthwhile sci-fi author since Asimov
These are wrong, not unpopular.
Whitman..
Ashbury...
Pound...
Dickinson...
Sandburg...
is just vapid commentary with odd line spacing
>>8917004
Yes.
>>8916977
that's one hell of a canyon
Joyce is a genius, not for his prose or literary styling, but in that he exposed three generations of pretentious ivory-tower pseuds and their followers, starting with TS Eliot, as automatons who essentially cannot see that the emperor has no clothes. Writing flowery prose to obscure your point was a true disaster in non-lyrical Anglo literature that continues to poison discourse and recognition of great works to this day. George Eliot, Thomas Hardy, and Beckett deserve far more praise than Joyce's Pollockesque prose.
‘Why don’t you write books people can read?”
-Nora Barnacle
>>8917043
>authors should stoop to my level instead of asking me to git gud
>>8916977
These are all unpopular irl but incredibly widespread ideas on /lit/