[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Shakespeare's Four Great Tragedies Reading Group: Macbeth

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 1

File: Shakespeare.jpg (295KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
Shakespeare.jpg
295KB, 1200x1200px
As proposed in this thread (>>8913960 → →), this will be a reading group for Shakespeare's Four Great Tragedies:

>Macbeth
>Hamlet
>Othello
>King Lear

I propose we start this week with Macbeth, the shortest of the four.

>Why only those four?

Because they are commonly grouped together by critics since A.C. Bradley as the greatest poetic and dramatic achievement of Shakeapeare. Of course, we can discuss the relevance of that claim and its implications, not just take it as a fact. Also, book clubs here seem to be about reading big works. Not even Hamlet could take that slot, so we are reading the four to "compensate".

>Aren't we doing a "Go Hard With the Bard" reading group?

We can do that, but I don't plan to take responsibility/management for that group. I also think we should do the FGT for now to test the waters and as a sort of introduction to Shakespeare for those who haven't read him. They also offer a set number of plays so that we don't have to choose and discriminate other plays (i.e. why not read X or Y comedy/tragedy/romance/problem play/history??????).

>What about the schedule?

I propose the following: one week for general reading and discussion of one of the tragedies, one week for either rereading the selected play, read secondary sources, and/or watch one or more productions of the play to discuss.
Plays aren't the same as novels and poems: they have a dramatic text and a performance text. They are meant to be read and to be performed, and many interesting things can be done with the performance text. It would bring about interesting discussions.

>You mentioned supplemental reading. What about it?

Secondary sources are optional, but I suggest we use two “main” texts as secondary sources:

>The Meaning of Shakespeare, two volumes, by Harold Goddard
>Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, by Harold Bloom

Here's a link with a lot of supplemental reading and secondary sources on Shakespeare. Goddard and Bloom are in there.

https://mega.nz/#!thsg0Q4S!3jxmsVHZqcaPMX_gwak4OSn7SVPOqWNWUuO2StcQAH0

>What about editions of the plays?

As far as editions go, you can choose from Oxford, Norton, New Cambridge, or Arden. In the MEGA link I shared, there are Arden editions for Hamlet and Othello, and an Oxford edition for King Lear. For Macbeth, here’s a link to the New Cambridge edition: http://bookzz.org/md5/31AFF3A8D2CC72A9EDA1F7110C10789C


Any other questions or suggestions are welcome.
>>
Reading groups are gay
>>
I love any Shakespeare thread.

I was watching Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story the other day, and, there was was a bit within a montage scene that I blanked out of my mind when I was younger, because my affinity for literature didn't come much later until I (in)voluntarily purged my love for video games.

Anyway, in the scene, Dewey is teaching his kids about Macbeth. The scene only lasts about 10 seconds, wherein Dewey says something along these lines:

"Macbeth, on the outside, is about revenge, but what is the underlying theme? The underlying theme is a battle for the Scottish throne!"

And I'm sitting there, wondering how self-aware the writers of this movie are, and I guess if I had to answer, I'd say they aren't.

I've read Macbeth three times and, at the risk of my showing my cards... it's the only play I've seen live. I have to eat and take a wicked piss, but if I had to define Macbeth with an underlying theme (pardoning the elementary analysis):

Macbeth is about getting what you want, not knowing if that's good enough, and the constant pursuit of something """""greater""""", whatever that means.

Oh, and besides Ophelia, Lady Macbeth is my Shakespeare WAIFU
>>
>>8914647
>Macbeth is about getting what you want, not knowing if that's good enough, and the constant pursuit of something """""greater""""", whatever that means.

I agree with you to an extent. In the play there's ambiguity in desire, but it is more than that.

Macbeth wants something greater no matter the cost, yes, but wouldn't you say that he is pushed that extreme? He is indecisive at first, but Lady Macbeth is the one that convinces him that he can be much more than he is now, but only if he acts.

But then the three weird sisters appear. I think they represent a sort of predetermintation. Macbeth wouldn't have done what he did had he not met the sisters. Then, are the sisters scrying the future, or setting it into motion?
>>
>>8914647
>Lady Macbeth

the way she is at the beginning of the play is pretty attractive
>>
>>8914679
Good call. How much of his misdeeds are his thought, and how much are Lady Macbeth? Is it 50/50?

About the witches... I always thought that they implanted the idea into Macbeth's mind, as something self-fulfilling, and him initially becoming a thane was a coincidence.

>>8914695
>>
>>8914754
>How much of his misdeeds are his thought, and how much are Lady Macbeth? Is it 50/50?

Coleridge said that Macbeth was planning Duncan's murder even before the play's beginning. Perhaps it is 50/50, but his wife is always pushing him whenever he doubts. She is so strong a characters, it even seems strange that she dies of despair later in the play.

>>8914754
>as something self-fulfilling, and him initially becoming a thane was a coincidence.

But the very fact that the witches can tell the future means that his becoming thane was no coincidence. But if they are setting the future into motion by their actions, then yes, his becoming a thane would be a coincidence. In that reading the play is actually full of fatal coincidences: Banquo's son escapes, Lady Macbeth's death, etc.
>>
Did anyone else want Macbeth to win?
>>
I'm in.
I don't know shit about Shakespeare's work so this will be a new experience to me.
>>
If you live in freedomland, I don't know about anywhere else, you can watch Patrick Stewart's Macbeth here for free.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/macbeth-full-episode/1030/
>>
Shit I'm down
>>
EQUIVOCATION IS AS DISASTROUS FOR CHARACTER AS PRIDE

Also one of the central themes of True Detective, Season Two
>>
>>8914811
Me. He deserved to didn't he?
>>
Anyone ever listened to an audio recording of Shakespeare?
I listened to the Arkangel Shakespeare Titus Andronicus and it was very good. Very easy to follow, though it is a simple play.
>>
>>8914647
Thank you for the quality post

>>8914754
In my view, Macbeth always wanted to seize the throne
He was always full of evil ambition, but was too indecisive to ever act on it
The Witches' predictions and Lady Macbeth's insults gave him the drive he needed
>>
Is Macbeth the contrary of Hamlet?

Where Hamlet is the contemplative man at first and then becomes the man of action, Macbeth is first the man of action and then becomes the contemplative man. There is always tension between deeds and words, something that recurs in all the great tragedies. In Macbeth it is more evident since there is always the drive of self-censorship: referring to regicide as "the deed", and Lady Macbeth's talking in her sleep shows the pressure of consciousness on her speech, so that when she is unconscious she is affected by all her repressed anxiety.
>>
>>8915199
As far as I can recall, Macbeth also starts out as being contemplative and later becomes a man of action.
>>
>>8915256
He is a famous warrior. The first scene where he appears shows him returning home after a battle, but then he and Banquo encounter the sisters and shit hits the fan. I'd say he starts as a man of action with purpose (war against an enemy), then becomes contemplative and needs external support to move him into action, and finally becomes a man of purposeless action (battle against his enemies because he has nothing lose and nothing to win; absurd action).
>>
Yup, yes, let's do it, I am down, this gonna be great, we're going to have so much fun guys
>>
>"Go Hard With the Bard"
I'm stealing this for my porn-parody of Shakespeare's biography. That id, if you don't mind.
Thread posts: 20
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.