Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: Russell-2[1].jpg (19KB, 261x326px) Image search:
[Google]
![Russell-2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wBLRXv3.jpg "Russell-2[1]")
19KB, 261x326px
A marxist post-structuralist continental Ecole Normale Supérieure professor and feminist activist was teaching a class on Martin Heidegger, known hermeneuticist.
”Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Nietzsche and accept that his genealogical method was the most highly-evolved theory the continent has ever known, even greater than Hegel's dialectics!”
At this moment, a brave, rational, positivist analytic philosopher who had read more than 15000 pages of Popper and Wittgenstein and understood the raison d'être of empiricism and fully supported all modern hard sciences stood up and held up the constitution.
”How universal is this text, frenchfag?"
The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied “It's not universal at all, fucking positivist, its 'truth' is rooted in our shared understandings about culture, the subject and the nexus of power and knowledge”
”Wrong. It’s been 225 years since human reason created it. If it was not universal, and post-modern relativism, as you say, is real… then it should be regarded as a myth now”
>>
The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of On Grammatology. He stormed out of the room crying those ironic post-modern crocodile tears. There is no doubt that at this point our professor, Michel Foucault, wished he had pulled himself up by his bootstraps and become more than an AIDS ridden sadomasochist interested in fisting. He wished so much that he had some kind of truth to hold on to, but he himself had written to disprove it!
The students applauded and all rolled into American universities that day and accepted Wittgenstein as the end of philosophy. An eagle named “Formal logic” flew into the room and perched atop the copy of "Principa Mathematica" and shed a tear on the hardcover. The last sentence of "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" was read several times, and Karl Popper himself showed up and demonstrated how dialectics is nothing but a means of justifying contradictions.
The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died of the gay plague AIDS and his "books" were disregarded for all eternity.
>>
File: 2f5de750b7a7e342c3e0919a0cfab9aa.jpg (34KB, 500x667px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 500x667px
Isn't it pretty to think so?
>>
>>8913776
>hermeneuticist
Do analytics actually have an issue with hermeneutics? Are they that retarded?
>>
>>8913776
>A marxist post-structuralist continental
(most)Continental philosophy is fine, but this doesn't really help your case
>>
>>8913779
>foucault
>implying he would own a copy of Of Grammatology when he had a vendetta against Derrida for over a decade
>>
>>8913776
>smirked quite Jewishly
it's funny that this is about the only element of the original that survives unchanged.
>>
>>8913840
No. See John McDowell, the epitome of contemporary analytic philosophy
>>
>>8913776
kek
>>
>implying dialectical materialism is compatible with endlessly polysyllabic postmodern nietzschean foucault psychobabble
>>
>>8913779
>Foucault
>the person who claimed that truth didn't exist, but only possible narratives
Your text makes as much sense as a dog licking its own crotch
>>
>>8914601
foucauldian*
>>
>>8915817
Do you expect logic out of Analytic bootlickers?
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2