>tfw I like literature but I really hate "literary types"

good, you seem like an insufferable faggot

>>8909186
>let's list all the books we've read in 2016
>slam poetry
>le spooks
>my books are better than your books
>pleb/patrician dichotomy
>middle-class depression
>"tfw you have your fourth existential crisis in a month"

get tae fuck. /lit/ is insufferable

>>8909180
most of /lit/ is actually more sincere and less pseudo-intellectual than the mass of elitist dilettantes i've met irl desu. like 90% of people invested in critical "academic" study of literature are wholly full of shit. At least here I don't have to acknowledge them.

>>8909201
Unironically visit /r/books then, they don't have anything you deem pretentious or pseudo-intellectual or talks of depression or discussion of pleb vs patrician there. They're the perfect picture of sincerity, albeit deceived and ignorant sincerity

Same

>>8909201
Ugh you're scottish.

Go sleep in your puddle of piss and buckfast you scummer

>>8909415
>implying people who use scots online when no one else is using it and with no provocation are scottish and not just people who've read trainspotting

>>8909415
>>8909427
I'm not scottish I've just been watching a lot of Limmy's show

>>8909439
Well I am so fucking cut it out m8

File: 33333333333334444444444444.jpg (1013KB, 971x3604px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 971x3604px

>>8909180
That's because "literary types" are pretty much just pseuds. They are also pretty anti-intellectualist, just like many STEM fags, which they hate.

>>8909810
Thank you for posting this.

>>8909180
Good for you for being the most special snowflake.

>>8909201
Granted, most of this stuff is cancer.