So It was "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote" just

Yes.
No.
I don't know.
What the fuck is that story about?

>>8895246
It was a subtle criticism of copyright laws.

>>8895715
I think you have the right idea, but I'd say it goes much further than that.

It's chiefly an exploration of:
1. The influence of context on the reception and analysis of a written work – or indeed any work of art
2. The very nature of what it means to be "original"

That's my interpretation of it, anyway.

>>8895246
It's about how the shadows of chairs look like cats

>>8895246
>"Haha, what if someone tried to write an exact copy of Don Quizote?" But it is only my interpretation. It cannot be that simple.

>>8895246
Holy shit what is the point of this thread? What compelled you to ask this question, and what personality flaw is to blame? What made you sit down, type this post out, and then attach an image? Was there a grand plan? What type of responses are you expecting?

Because by the looks of this question, its sheer marginality in scope, it does not seem that you will get much at all, at least not enough to gratify your inanity.

>>8897098

r u k sugar?