When google searching "greatest philosophers", the

Marx is a cuck

>>8858515
But why?

Schopenhauer deserves the cut. John Stuart Mill or Adam Smith or John Rawls deserves the addition.

>>8858509
Marx. He was a disgusting cuck who didn't take the redpill

>>8858530
pills weren't invented yet silly

>>8858527
>cutting Schop before Russell, Rousseau, Sartre, Marx, or Descartes, or Confucius

>>8858509
- Plato

+ Diogenes

Russell, Rousseau, Sartre out.

Mill, Adam Smith and Peirce in.

Confucius isn't even a philosopher.

>>8858509
marx out, berkeley in

rousseau out, chomsky in

>>8858601
1 addition: confucius out, g.e. moore in

ok

>>8858509
Locke, Sartre, Russell and Rousseau out

20 white guys.
Color me surprised.

>>8860054
Philosophers are men who think for long periods of time. Why does it surprise you that they're white?

>>8860054
>Confucius
>white guy

hmm

>>8858527
>John Rawls
Lmao

>>8858509
Cut Russell, Sartre, and Socrates (Plato covers this). Add Hobbes, Foucault, and Kierkegaard. Maybe replace Marx with Smith.

>>8860077
A-ha!
there was one poc on the list! therefore the list isn't racist! fuck you non-white subhmans for wanting to be equal amirite guise?

>>8860087
Name a single person of color that is made an equal contribution to philosophy as those twenty in the OP.

Hint: some have done much less than the others

>>8860087
No, fuck you non-white subhumans for demanding equality of outcome and pretending it's about equality of opportunity and calling anyone who disagrees racist.

>>8860087
You said 20 white guys originally, so when someone pointed out you were wrong, you went into an autistic fit. Not surprising desu

File: 1352867812638.jpg (30KB, 305x283px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 305x283px

>>8860087

>equal

Just because you get to vote and have the same rights as us doesn't mean we have to re-write our history to make it more inclusive of "PoCs"

I'm sure if you typed the same question into Chinese google you would get a list of Asian philosophers, so why don't you take a chill pill my colored friend? Not everything is this huge conspiracy to fuck you over.

>>8858596
What makes you say that?

Platonic and Aristophanic Socrates are top notch. Xenophone a shit.

Platonic and Aristophanic Socrates are top notch. Xenophone a shit.

As for those that deserve to be dropped there are many...
But ESPECIALLY Sartre. What a hack.

>>8858509
Stirner deserves all 20 spots. Philosophy is a spook.

>>8860087
Yes, you subhuman nigger.

>>8860087
pathetic

>>8858527
Adam Smith is basically Hume's conclusions spelled out for stupid people.
Also >>8860081

>>8858509
Doesn't have Aristotle, Leibniz, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Why is Rousseau on there?

>>8860054
>greeks
>white
you can cut most of those whites on that list off

>>8858531
Sorry, he meant that he didn't get the amputation of the necrotic parts

>out
Satre
>in
Popper

>>8861117
what makes anyone say anything ?

File: hegel.jpg (39KB, 309x400px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 309x400px

>>8861648
>Popper

>>8858509
Marx was a political whiny.
Sartre was a glorified novelist.
Confucius is why China is terrible.

>>8861650
Why think about that?

>>8858527
>John Rawls
>this is how sheltere

>>8861794
I'll admit I'm taking a shit right now and wanted to stop writing that because it was really self-indulgent, but accidentally hit "post"

I'm not sure why the fact that I'm taking a shit is important but it is

File: fedora.jpg (26KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x750px

>>8858824
>Locke
>I don't rate Locke

>>8860087
It seems like this board is very easy to troll

>>8860087
>fragile retards replying to this
it's very hard for me to give anyone on this board the benefit of the doubt re: intelligence when so many of you can't even discern a simple b8ing. consider going back to your home boards/reddit

File: 13515_1.jpg (60KB, 728x409px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 728x409px

>>8861674

>Confucius is why China is terrible
Marx/Mao have nothing to do with this?

>>8858527
>John Rawls
kek
>American
>Philosopher
pick one

>>8863359
>he hasn't read Peirce

>>8863365
>analytic shit
>philosophy
pick one

>>8863359

William Henry?

Plato should be on there but Socrates should be lumped in with him.

I think it's a solid list for Western philosophy. It's too hard for me to think of Eastern philosophy in the same way and for the same list, because the tradition has such a different history, role in society, and methodology. It's just as great though. Nagarjuna is easily the philosopher I think about in my daily life more than any other, though I'm a Buddhist so I'm biased.

>>8863355

>China only existed after communism

Marx is more a political theorist than a philosopher