which philosophers take history real seriously and are into it

Me

Foucault

>>8843029
casanova

Schiller

File: 1477711055071.png (779KB, 647x656px) Image search: [Google]

779KB, 647x656px

>>8843029
Hegel

>>8843029
Nietzsche

>>8843029
Marx

literally me, just wait around 10~15 years

>>8843116
what a fucking picture

Thomas Carlyle

I'd consider Oswald Spengler a historical philosopher as well

File: yarvin.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>8843455
>

>>8843455
Seconding Spengler.
Carlyle is something else really. I like him but I don't think that's exactly what OP is after.

>>8843801
This guy seems completely incapable of grasping philosophy or poetry but has probably the most entertaining blog in the history of the internet.

Marx and Hegel are good options as well.

>>8843029
Giambattista Vico is the father of historicism, Hegel, Marx and Spengler all owe him a great deal. Maybe he's too overtly Christian for some people but there are some solid ideas in the New Science. I suspect he actually had quite radical and unorthodox ideas for the time.

>>8843808
Yeah, Moldbug is such good fun to read. He did introduce me to Carlyle, who was also an excellent writer in many respects.

As for OP, what exactly do you mean? In a certain sense, Machiavelli used history for political philosophy in the Prince.

File: wait.gif (494KB, 500x259px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 500x259px

>>8843116
>thinks light/dark dualistic worship came about BEFORE animalism

>>8843116
who's the cartoon

>>8843902
Looks like little witch academia

it's good and short, watch it on netflix