Can you name a book that (implicitly) develops the premise that

The Symposium

>>8831688
looking more for something more recent
one can squeeze only so much relevance out of classic sources

Corydon, maybe. Haven't read it.

>>8831684
What a horribly worded shit question.

You are asking for a book which uses m > f, to say that m+m > m+f?

Sounds like some shit you would find in an r9k trap/femboi thread.

You can find implied shit in classical sources, such as Tiresias related stories. Usually they shun faggotry beyond appreciation though.

File: 0.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

Wrong board.

>>8831733
czech new wave was a mistake, nothing but garbage

>>8831728
>You are asking for a book which uses m > f, to say that m+m > m+f?
yes

>>8831744
Men are better than women; this is self evident
A healthy sexual act requires a masculine and a feminine partner
Therefore the best sex is between a manly man and a feminine one
Males are at their most feminine in thee pubescent stages
Therefore, shota is the highest form of male sexuality

>>8831751
I bit. This is just rehashing heteros. I'm looking for lit opposite this.

File: Kehaar 2.jpg (26KB, 600x330px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x330px

>>8831751
You in big trouble, froggy.

File: 1470873291725.png (95KB, 233x255px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 233x255px

>I'm going to be a rebel by extrapolating bourgeous ideals of romantic monogamous love unto everything.
What's the damn point of proving an option is superior to another when they aren't mutually exclusive? What are you trying prove here? What's stopping you from having both eggs and oranges?

>>8831684
There's one book for you, only one, and it's exactly about what you're asking. Les Meteores by Michel Tournier.

>>8831684
ulysses?

>>8831684

I think Memoirs of Hadrian is what you need

(it was written by a woman, though)

>>8833428
>>8833529
No, you better shut up, plebs. He needs Les Meteores by Michel Tournier.

The bible

>>8831688
yeah nah, not an endorsement of homosexuality except on the most superficial reading.