Should good philosophy be ubiquitous and applicable to all men? Should it trandacend cultural, linguistic, ideological barriers?
A wealthy man, a poor man, a genius, an idiot, a healthy man, a sickly man, a mentally sound, and an insane one, a man who experiences orgasm, and the one undergoing torture - should a 'good' philosophical discourse equally prescribe a course for all of them?
I cannot take, for example, Plato, seriously, in his perfect world only select few get to have any worth, and everyone else is a glorified tool
That's what tradition is.
>>8796733
Trandacend?
>>8796733
"Good philosophy"?
citation needed.
>>8796733
>Should it trandacend cultural, linguistic, ideological barriers?
philosophy is ideology. Should philosophy be decaf, "friendly" ideology that can be applied without conflicting with other ideologies? Fuck no.
No.
t. Hegel..
>>8797046
>He fell for the Heggle meme.