is this worth reading? i'm with the neoplatonists,

>>8783551
>reading obscurantist frog faggots

not even once

Just fucking read it.

>>8783551
>inb4 zizek

Zizek's relationship to Deleuze is actually very complex, I wouldn't categorize it as any fundamental agreement or disagreement

>>8783554
i like GBE for its capacity to make (a certain type of) sense when you open any page at random.

from the brief second i flipped through it, that same quality seems to exist (IIRC, don't they encourage reading it in this way?)

>>8783556
>live in BFE with shit libraries
>paying $12 for a book that could be marxist nonsense
>marxist nonsense is somewhat redundant

>>8783561
zizek claims that this is deleuze's weakest work and he'd recommend repetition and whatever.

File: 584032.jpg (61KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x480px

>>8783578
Then fuck off then, /lit/ is shithole, never ask us what to read, ever.

File: john does not drink FUCKING merlot.jpg (167KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1024x576px

>>8783583
cheers m8

Did you like Gravity's Rainbow? It's basically the same thing.

Definitely entertaining and interesting even if you don't find the larger philosophical project compelling.