Do women really read her books or do they just watch the movies? Her writing is pretty advanced and this is the same audience that reads YA books. I have a hard time believing they can comprehend her advanced prose.
>>8782384
All the women that I've met that's even heard of these works, have only watched the movies.
Not to say that they aren't capable of understanding the prose, but films are marketed in such a way that entices them into submission in a way that only a woman could fall under.
Why does this board hate women so much? I've had my fair share of getting fucked over by women, believe me, but I have never developed such pathological feelings towards women such as this board does.
>>8782766
>literally only women are dumb enough to be so swayed under the influence of a dumb movie
>lol why do you guys hate women so much haha?
>>8782766
/r9k/ infestation.
Two years or so ago we could have threads on women writers with little to no trolling.
>implying OP understands half the stereotypes she used as characters from their vocab
not happening.
>>8782766
>dat pic
errytime
>>8782774
I didn't say women were dumb, I just implied that women are susceptible to enjoy to certain things, just as men are to certain things. It's not always the case, but it's a safe assumption.
>>8782775
Why would robots even come here, let alone stay?
>>8782778
>>8782775
But the OP is creating a real discussion, it is the rest of you turning it into a woman hate fest.
>>8782766
yikes
I saw like 4 or 5 adaptations of Austen between 13 and 16, the three Pride and Prejudice ones after reading the book at 14.
Period films are their own genre and doesn't necessarily relate to wanting to read the books or not preferring other books (I like horror and noir movies, but don't have much interest in reading either.).
Also there's the assumption that old=hard to read or boring (not gender specific), so there's that barrier. But I also know girls who otherwise read middleborw mainstream fiction or thrillers who also read Jane Austen and not many other 19th century fiction.
>>8782965
>I have a hard time believing they can comprehend her advanced prose.
and Austen isn't hard to read dingus, there's a reason it's been popular for a hundred years