Who are some great writers with the love of humanity in their hearts?
I want the grandest sense of empathy possible.
>>8780474
Kjv Bible
God, the king of all kings, Lord of Lords, became a man and died for all our sins and if we simply trust He did that for us, we're granted eternal life the same second.
Me you stupid fuck
>>8780474
Leodor Tolstoyevsky
>>8780483
There is great love in NT but also great hatred.
>>8780483
>Believe in magic and follow a bunch of rules and you'll get an unspecified reward
>>8780488
Whats a short work by each of them that's a good way to test them out?
>>8780490
wow a sarcastic comment, it must be true.
>>8780474
george orwell and nikolai gogol
>>8780512
For Tolstoy, The Death of Ivan Ilyich
For Dostoyevsky, White Nights.
or you could take this shit seriously and read Anna Karenina and The Brothers Karamazov.
>>8780483
unless you're a FAGGOT
>>8780531
God does not hate homosexuals, he hates the act. He died for them too on the cross.
>>8780474
Unironically Max Stirner.
>>8780540
I haven't read it.
Right now I'm reading a collection of his short stories which I highly recommend, moving on to Dead Souls after.
>>8780474
>>8780531
Sounds good to me.
Montaigne
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Melville really loved humanity right? That's what all the sperm-squeezing hand-holding was about?
Simone Weil
Memoirs of Hadrian.
>>8780615
My friend bought me that book! I'm excited for it honestly.
>>8780627
Oh, it was a great read.
>>8780490
>I'm retarded and can't be bothered to read anything about it cause then I can't be in the Special Olympics
>>8780474
Epictetus
>not posting the GOAT lover
>>8780474
Michael Slote. Read "The Ethics of Care and Empathy."
>>8780536
This. There's a reason Marx hated him. Stirner managed to put together a philosophy that can love and admonish all people without having to sacrifice neither the individual nor self-consciousness for a utopia.
>>8781174
Patrician taste
>>8781174
Not so fast!
Also James Joyce, when you get past his asperities of brilliance, was one of the great literary benefactors of humanity. Shelley (P.B.) was a very great softy as well. And of courseShakespeare.
>>8780474
Schopenhauer, Benatar, Ligotti, Zapffe, Cioran.
>>8781495
0/10
>>8780474
Chekhov
>>8780474
Watched the Great Dictator recently, did we?
>>8781767
nope, just thought it was a phrase that wouldn't be confused
James Salter
Basho
Rumi
>>8780474
I wish I knew you in real life, OP; I'd give you a worthy list of titles and authors.
Asking that question on 4chan is crazy, though.
Pearls before swine, yards yadda yadda.
>>8782187
>Finally, we meet in person! Now I shall present you my list.
>First we have Kurt Vonnegut...
>>8782193
1st. Lose the Cancerman pics (Feels, frogs whatever)
2nd. Don't use those terms (Robots, chads etc.)
3rd. You may get something out of reading Cyrano de Bergerac
>>8780474Ο ΑΓΙΟΣ ΟΜΗΡΟΣ
>>8781516
I'm serious though. If you really care for people you do not want them to suffer.
Read Middlemarch.
>>8782638
>Cyrano de Bergerac
In real life that kind of shit happens all the time, and there's never a happy ending.
>>8782894
listen well OP
>>8782879
If you really care, like the almighty, you will understand that suffering is essential to life as is reward. A good man was never free from suffering.
>>8782894
Oh I have I decided to use Ovid instead of.george Eliot so I'd deal with fewer shitposters
>>8782879
most people do not learn anything
with, the few who learn, most of them learn only after having suffer
it is quite rare to find somebody who learns by just watching people's mistake
>>8783068
Read both. Middlemarch is also the ultimate antidote to the retarded identity politics "dae think everything women write is shit" threads. I can conceive of someone not liking Middlemarch, but to argue that it's poorly written is pure shitposting.
>>8783067
>unironically worshipping the demiurge
>>8783536
I have read both. Middlemarch is my favorite novel, but those sexist dummies are people I didn't feel like dealing with so I avoided using it in Op.