>1,074 pages >yfw normies and women are more dedicated

>>8770932
Speak for yourself, I'm on my fourth rereading of À la recherche du temps perdu

>what is for-normie typesetting?

hint: it's why people can read all the harry potter hardcover books in 1 day, even though there are like 2000 pages in total

>>8770932
I read this after it came out because I had never read a Stephen King book. It was mediocre but very easy to blow through. It baffles me that people can read Atlas Shrugged all the way through, I quit when they got to Galt's Gulch.

>>8770932
just watch the Simpsons movie instead

>>8770940
This. 50 pages of Jerusalem or Ulysses take more effort than a 250+ genre ""novel""

>>8771057
Jerusalem was a grand read though. Fecking love that clouds unfold chapter

I'm thankful for these literature police threads. How can I go about my day not having made fun of casual readers even once!

>>8771121
i agree lol

pleb and proud!!!

>>8771115
>Culchie pretends he can read

>>8770932
For those who have read this, did you find some of the slang jarring? It's been a while but I particularly remember the skateboarder kid using slang that was more appropriate for the 1980s.

There were so many odd anachronisms I went back at one point to see if I'd missed when it was set. And I half expected a twist involving them being in some sort of time warp or experiment.

It's like one of his kids was into skating in the 80s and he just went with what he remembered. Kill you to do a little research, Steve?

Is Stephen Spielberg just misunderstood?

>>8771133
You words hurt my bogger soul

>>8770932
Have they even read it though? I figure most have just watched the show on tv.

>>8771228
Yes, he really is.

>>8770932
i read it and honestly there's absolutely no substance to it.