the biggest spooks of them all - 1. people don't act in

>>8756284
>people don't act in self-interest.
Are you saying this is a "spook" and people do act in self interest? Or the reverse?
Either way, that's not a spook. Read Stirner.

>>8756354
the former. they do even if they don't know it themselves, the mentally ill are the exceptions hence the mental illness.
you're asking me to read stirner when you clearly haven't? that's the entire point of the book.

>>8756284
everything is a spook

>>8756284
Listening to you telling me how to lead my life is the spookiest thing of all.

Everyone should live the way they know is best for them, whatever it may be. That is the only way to truly avoid the spooks.

>>8756739
Implying dissolution of nation states in favor of unions of egoists isn't in my best interest.

>>8756284
Stirner brings some interesting ideas to the table which I really like, but a lot of his recent following seems to come from people who want to turn "spooks" into a new argument fallacy instead of people who actually follow Max's ideas of self interest above abstract goals.

File: le wise philosopher.jpg (20KB, 474x528px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 474x528px

like what if, hear me out here dude, lets say we went "beyond" the categories of "good" and "evil"

"People only act in self intrest" is also a spook.

>>8758036
so, "bad", also?