Someone please explain to me why people read this shit I've

they see themselves in it

>>8750567
Its like Turner Diaries or Lolita. People only read it to say theyve read it and seem edgy.

so they can say the film ruined it
>>8751135
lolita is a very popular novel, edgelords would pick something by peter sotos

>>8751148
Okay, popular sure. But if you're reading uncovered on a train or some shit, you're doing it so people who know what it is notice you reading it, the irony of course being that anyone who knws what it is is going to know what you're doing and think you are a cringey edgelord

>>8750567
It's pretty good shitposting material

This novel really triggers nerds.

>>8751152
You're shitting on a work you know little about solely based on hypothetical straw man edge lords who haven't read it either

>>8750567
literally his worst book biatch

>>8750567
>hi guys, im a girl on internet xD!

>>8751589
no internet tuff guy pls

>>8751152
God you are one stupid jaded faggot. There is no reason that reading one of the most widely novels of all time in public is inherently edgy. Try seeing things for what they actually are.

>>8751602
>one of the most widely novels of all time
no and no

>>8751611
I think that something went wrong with your quote bud so I cant really grasp the meaning of it. But really, there is no denying the massive popularity of this book. Its something that most people have read or at least know about through the films and is fairly well acknowledged for its artistic value.