is it worth reading a book if you know how it ends? Most notably

If the book is Anna Karenina then yes because her story is the shit part anyway

If it's not then you know this spoiler is nothing to get mad about

>>8733057
you'lll only miss out on one of many things a good book has to offer

>reading for plot

>>8733057
There's a reason we don't just read Wikipedia plot summaries instead of reading books, anon.

>missing out on a good book because you know only one detail of the story

do you even read anything thats not fantasy trash

>>8733057
Do you say that because you're reading Exit the King?
I advised it to the last person who posted with that picture this week

Cervantes mentions it himself, it's no secret or twist that Don Quijote dies.

>>8733110
No but I am that person. I wouldnt count that particular example given that his death is such a large part of the story that its literally the title.

Was an interesting read though, as I was 100% sure i was going to die at three times in my life (Lyme disease, Kidney failure, and some bathtub street acid. never again) so it was somewhat relatable.

>>8733123
If I remember correctly you wanted to experience some "existential crisis", given what you say you already had some occasions

Anyway yes it is worth reading a book knowing how it ends, a good book let you re-read it and always find new things

The meme is not caring about the plot

You'll know the end on your second and third reads anyways, doesn't matter.

>>8733062
>If the book is Anna Karenina then yes because her story is the shit part anyway
I hope you die in pain for writing this.