I'm convinced so many anons like Dostoevsky because they

>>8720972

>theirfw Dosto was only r9k ironically, in that one book
>and in The Double

>>8720990
An ugly poor engineer that can't relate to r9k thoughts in at least one point of his early life? please. cmon now. wow

>>8720972
or cuz he wuz human af.

wuzzit matter if someone else likes him?

>>8720972
R9K is incapable of at least expressing their bitter autistic rage in a manner as concise as Notes.

>>8721005

>tfw no qt3.14 landlady

>retribution themed stories
Shit was painfully spooky to read.

Dosto: /r9k/
Tolstoj: /pol/
Turgenev: /lit/

>>8721055
>pleb spotted

*Pushkin: /lit/

At least Dostoyevsky liked to do self-destructive things and challenged his own beta-ness. Robots are just pitifully self-wallowing fuckups.

>>8721078
>beta-ness

If anything, he was alpha. Are you aware of his life story? it's pretty terrible, and I wouldn't trade places with him for a second.

File: 1376361726525.png (313KB, 701x394px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 701x394px

>>8720972
Is there any greater sign of disgusting ignorance than claiming dostoevsky is "r9k"? It's just pathetic that anyone would bend his image and arguments and contort them so far just to fit the image of him being a similar dumb beta.

>>8721055
Where does Lermentov go?

>>8721168
Try harder; He's a hack.

>>8720972
Duh
It's not the only reason, of course, but the robots and semi-robots definitely do appreciate that element.

>>8721055
>Tolstoj: /pol/
No