>you will never go back in time and prevent him and engels

>>8709625
It only makes sense that the kind of person to make a post like this wouldn't understand a dialectic

I don't even like Marxism or any form of Socialism but it doesn't mean Marx and Engels weren't brilliant men.

>>8709637
yeah, other than being wrong about everything, they were pretty smart.

>>8709641
You're the worst sort of human being. They manufacture you in cold study. If it weren't for your autism you'd surely be pulled off the market

>>8709641
>wrong about everything
They weren't and you know it. At worst, Marx failed to make a strong case against Engels on the whole materialism vs dialectics issue

>>8709678
>>8709685
Face it reds, your whole ideal is a sham.

>>8709709
>flatly assert something without providing argument or proofs
You know the deal

>>8709633
Are you the one I've been seeing all over using the word "dialectic" in a barely-correct context?

>>8709720
How many dialectics are you on right now, my dude?

File: 1470290804999.png (330KB, 498x460px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 498x460px

>>8709637
lol all their """""solutions""""" failed horribly

bismarck was the real brilliance

fuck /lit/ has gone to shit lately.

sage

>>8709732
go back to heftylol

>>8709720
Yes, I've been following you, posting all around you

>>8709727
I'm deep through at least 7 dialectics - you'll never find me.

File: 1478675196813.jpg (65KB, 1031x1070px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1031x1070px

>>8709739
>heftylol