Are there any books or other media sources that studies groups

>>8707121
The Bible, literally, d e s u

>>8707131
What? You gotta be joking.

>>8707134
Noted, will put on reading list.

>>8707121
milo yiannopoulos have some good points, just watch her speach on YouTube.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Believer

I think Jordan Peterson is doing some stuff with one of his grad students about how some kind of authoritarian personality trait is reliably associated with tyrannical/zealot behaviour in SJW stuff

Economic belief is basically homogeneous among the mainstream, so they are all having to cling to their identities, because it's the only real difference.

>>8707121
Orwell has an essay called On Nationalism along these lines
http://orwell.ru/library/essays/nationalism/english/e_nat

>By ‘nationalism’ I mean first of all the habit of assuming that human beings can be classified like insects and that whole blocks of millions or tens of millions of people can be confidently labelled ‘good’ or ‘bad’(1). But secondly — and this is much more important — I mean the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognising no other duty than that of advancing its interests. Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. Both words are normally used in so vague a way that any definition is liable to be challenged, but one must draw a distinction between them, since two different and even opposing ideas are involved. By ‘patriotism’ I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally. Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power. The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality.
So long as it is applied merely to the more notorious and identifiable nationalist movements in Germany, Japan, and other countries, all this is obvious enough. Confronted with a phenomenon like Nazism, which we can observe from the outside, nearly all of us would say much the same things about it. But here I must repeat what I said above, that I am only using the word ‘nationalism’ for lack of a better. Nationalism, in the extended sense in which I am using the word, includes such movements and tendencies as Communism, political Catholicism, Zionism, Antisemitism, Trotskyism and Pacifism. It does not necessarily mean loyalty to a government or a country, still less to one's own country, and it is not even strictly necessary that the units in which it deals should actually exist. To name a few obvious examples, Jewry, Islam, Christendom, the Proletariat and the White Race are all of them objects of passionate nationalistic feeling: but their existence can be seriously questioned, and there is no definition of any one of them that would be universally accepted.

>>8707141
her?
>>8707149
This looks a real gem, definitely putting it on my list.
>>8707159
A very interesting read.Thanks.

>>8707121
>atheists believe religion is the biggest source of wrong in the world
Most of them think that *faith* is the biggest source of wrong in the world, not religion. Faith is believing something without evidences can be religious but also political and ideological.