can we discuss this man? I've already read most of his well-known

>>8702881
Take this rebbitesque thread back to redbbt with you, faggot

>>8702881
Kafkaesque is generally used in the case of a pointless, complex bureaucratic system, but the meaninglessness does link nicely with the idea of the absurd.

What is the distinction between kafkaesque and byzantine?

>>8702892
Considering reddit may be a smarter place than lit I may have to

>>8702899
Are you posting from your Reading class?

>>8702902
Remove this post from my board right now. I won't tell you again.

>>8702902
DELETE THIS AND LEAVE

>>8703395
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>8702881

God damnit /lit/ would you rather get high off of your own neck-beard fumes or discuss literature on a literature board. This is why I don't visit 4chan anymore. Fucking plebs everywhere up in here.

It was a decent thread OP maybe the discussion seemed too shallow to the pseuds of lit. Maybe try again another time making a thread about a specific Kafka work, because I think this ones done for.

>>8702902
>reddit may be a smarter place than /lit/
They are impressively not smarter.

I find it odd that all these years 4chan was the unironic height of intellectual public discussion.

this is what "intellectualism" looks like in real life:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DTlj2NgPck

>>8703493
Parliamentary debate being made weird by Americans is no surprise.

>>8702902
You're an idiot, >>8702895 answered your question perfectly and instead on recognising that you're just whining like a little bitch.