Now that we know that the world is fundamentally Will to Entropy, is he pretty much useless?
He's a litmus test for disregarding edgy teen plebs. Useful as fuck, my dude.
>>8682417
>my dude
edgy teen pleb detected
Entropy presupposes a systematic universe.
As Oswald Spengler said he is good to create a questioning mind but beyond that...
>>8683501
Spot on desu
>>8683496
"Systematic" presupposes
an entropy universe
>>8682399
nah cause entropy isn't something well covered in literature
>>8683501
You act like there is some end goal. You will live a miserable life.
>>8682399
I think Mr Hyneman is lookin' pretty spiffy in that get-up if you ask me.
>>8683732
>You will live a miserable life.
Probably. Not as miserable as Nietzsche's though.
>>8684367
>he assesses the value of things according to pleasure and pain
wabalabadab
>>8684390
yeah, or self governance or accumulated power, or consistency or...
Anyways, miserable in the context of a life doesn't mean valueless, it means unhappy.
Can we say that objects that do not move themselves act according to will?
>>8684408
Yes. Schopenhauer explains that gravity and magnetism are examples of a very low species of the Will.
>>8684408
No object moves itself.
>>8684390
>he assesses the value of things at all
>>8683640
The book of the new sun