What's some good general ways to learn random shit, about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

>>8679948
Wikipedia is incredibly biased, ie look at any gamergate or trump article and tell me thats an objective encylopedia. Total joke.

Pass first-year STEM then use your over-inflated sense of worth to mystify BA kiddies who lock themselves into a blind science vs. art dichotomy.

>>8680001
If you can't understand how to glean information from Wikipedia, there is no helping you.

Maybe try reading

>>8680013
this desu

Spend all your free time on Wikipedia

>>8680001
Just use it as a starting base to find books or scientific articles and so on and so on to read.

just make shit up. readers today are so stupid they'll believe anything.

incidentally, did you know that the sun is almost twice as large as the moon, but appears almost the same size because it's further away!

I was reading Zizek. At some point he uses a Wikipedia definition. I literally threw it out the window, fuck knows where it is now, probably landed a truck.

>>8680644
>>8680644
I didn't even know the sun had a quantifiable "size", thought it just just a decentralised energy source that visually condensed in a bright light-blackhole, as in a vanishing point

I've been on almost daily Wikipedia/google binges since I was 13 i.e. more than a decade of HARDCORE WIKI ABUSE and I still don't consider myself knowledgable about the world.

For you to come along and ask such a naive question, I don't even know what to tell you.

>>8680662
O Encyclopædophile Supremest, thou hast
With guileful fair words wisdom abstain'd.

>>8680001
It seems your problem isn't your sources but you have a bad case of the stupids