Does anyone have the chart that has this, some Eliade and Hero

File: 1469650471019.jpg (210KB, 780x1200px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 780x1200px

is this it you disgusting fucking cunt?

>>8667626
Indeed it is, thanks.

I remember it having a title though.

File: 5152719+_5b7a31230ba901cda2229559b845df88.jpg (59KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 380x380px

>>8667626
>Jung
>In any chart

>>8667629
Good luck making a primer on perennialism and mythology without including him.

>>8667634
Yeah it'd be pretty fucking easy, especially when the competition is an amateur piece of shit that doesn't even include Lévi-Strauss

>>8667639
This is clearly working from a traditionalist/phenomenological angle, hence the absence of structuralists which would otherwise be obvious picks like Levi-Strauss or Durkheim.

The only odd one out here is Freud Tbh

>>8667645
>This is clearly working from a traditionalist/phenomenological angle

In other words, it fails the basic function of a primer

>>8667648
How so? It's not supposed to encompass all aspects of the philosophy of religion.

>>8667653
Only according to your specific labelling of it which smells of retroactive rehabilitation

>>8667658
Do you have some kind of problem with religious phenomenology?

>>8667668
No just Jungians who now try to reconstruct their nonsense in the language of phenomenologists, who I respect

>>8667669
I personally haven't actually read much Jung at all, but as far as I can understand, he was influential to perennialists, which in turn influenced phenomenologists.

>>8667645
>The only odd one out here is Freud Tbh

Freud is just stepping stone to Jung

>>8667626
thanks, seems interesting!

File: Campbellcanteven.jpg (31KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x360px

>>8667669