What should I read to help me become a subjective 4chan mystic,

File: HegelPowerfulSorcerer.jpg (155KB, 700x474px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 700x474px

>>8665017
Pic related.

(Obviously with a very good secondary source and some background in Kant.)

File: Not Being retarded.png (294KB, 889x592px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 889x592px

>>8665083
Start with The Science of Logic by the way, or the shorter logic in the encyclopedia, then Phenomenology. Then you will ascend.

>>8665083
I don't understand all of this talk about Hegel being a wizard? Did he have an interest in the occult or something?

these types of pictures make me cringe to no end please STOP posting them

File: image.jpg (248KB, 648x648px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 648x648px

>>8665128
No way

>>8665128
Eh, it's a half-decent meme.

Duck fucked up with his definition of "intrinsic value".
Mickey fucked up with his autistic nihilism/absurdism.

That's life.

>>8665017
wow mickey is fucking retarded

>>8665106
fire is materialised time

File: image.jpg (59KB, 741x556px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 741x556px

>>8665316
Say that to my face fucker not online and see what happens

>>8665017
Friced Riced Nevsky

>>8665017
mickey isn't a mystic there
his position is scientific agnosticism, scepticism, w/e you call it. he clearly learned some epistemology

if one of them is a mystic it's scientist donald who believes in the objective truth which is in his mind is what the science currently (!) knows

File: prometheus.jpg (19KB, 200x311px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 200x311px

>>8665017

This book sent me to some strange galaxy. I'm not sure which one, and I'm not certain how to get back.

>>8666133
i believe his "the new inquisition" is more on topic

there is a high chance to misunderstand that book though, even carl sagan wrote it was against sceptics when it is actually pro-sceptics, it's simply sceptical to the mainstream scientific fundamentalism which sceptics usually tend to ignore with their sceptical attention

it's irrelevant to the tread though since this thread isn't about science whatsoever, donald and mickey speak about ideas and ontology, not about some verifiable concepts, mickey calls out donald on pretending to be scientific when donald in fact speaks unverifiable things

>>8665106
Because Hegel's philosophy is so mind-blowing that it seems like magic.

>>8666188

Maybe your right. I was about to start an argument about tautology and robert anton wilson's philosophies on life, and how prometheus rising is about exactly what the mickey mouse cartoon is about.

But I'm too tired.

>>8666319
actually you are probably right, i forgot that the topic was not discussing the op pic, but answering his question :3

>>8665106
Yes actually, or so it seems to some scholars