Have any of you guys read Ben Shapiro's first venture into

>>8662723
I think you should kill yourself

>>8662723
literally who

>>8662782
This.

>>8662723
You have to go back

>>>/pol/

>>8662792
Never been

Any legit answers? Or is it just the samefag?

>>8662723
It's pretty good, but it's not literature, obviously. Shapiro wasn't trying to make literature, but political commentary wrapped up in an entertaining narrative. I'm a pretty big supporter of his political stance, so that helped me appreciate it more.

>>8662788
Very appropriate dubs.

>>8662787
some jew

>>8662862
Thank you for not being a fag. I agree with most of his positions, and enjoy his sense of humor. I like his non fiction entries, going to grab this in physical form

>>8662862
I like u

>>8662723
does it include copious amounts of shilling for Israel?

if not I might give it a try

>>8662862
>>8663003
>I agree with being a traitor shill

>>8662792
>/pol/ likes Shapiro

You have to go back >>>/reddit/

Pleb fiction.

Highly educated Jew can only produce pleb lit targeted at (you guessed it), plebs.

Pretty sad desu.

I expected someone with Shapiro's hubris to do what Glenn Beck and Bill O Reilly have done and make their names as big or bigger than the title.

Anyway, if you want reactionary literature, read Evola or Faye or some of Oswald Moseley's work. Conservashits are not worth reading if they ever use terms like free market favorably.

>>8663216
>>8663066
>mfw the only possible arguments against Shapiro are ad hominems

>>8663225
>only possible
Mien gott
How does the ideology consume you this hard

>>8662862
Do you even know the definition of literature?

>>8663241
You haven't done much to disprove his point, anon

>>8663033
No, not really, he adamantly cares about America, he clearly press America first

I haven't read it but Shapiro has always struck me as a very clever guy, so if its mostly politically driven I suppose it can't be all too bad.
wouldn't expect anything special literary-wise however.