What one must read before Mein Kampf? I've already read

>>8661701
"The Idiot" would be a good one.

Paul de Lagarde

File: 1455843611381.jpg (67KB, 476x717px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 476x717px

>>8661701
you're good

The Decline of the West

>>8661701
Start with the greeks

>>8661701
I seriously hope you're reading for historical curiosity and not because of some sensationalist /pol/ shit

>>8661701
The protocols of the elders of zion was like 30% plagiarized from some other book

Gobineau - inequality of human races.
Chamberlain - the foundations of the twentieth century.

I'm convinced that alt-right national socialism is purely motivated by the whole neo-roman military aesthetic and has nothing to do with politics or economics

>>8663133
Fuckng epic XD

>>8661701
As always, Mein Kampf is important as a piece of literature because Hitler set out what he was going to do, and noone in the west thought to actually read it. Then he did what he set out to do.

As actual literature you would be better off reading Spengler or Evans and browsing the wiki. It is an intolerable read, and this coming from a WW2 lit nut.

Yeah you can read it now, ignore the others

My diary desu

>>8661701
on the jewish question by karl marx

>>8661701
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was a fake. I would recommend reading Capital: Volume 1 by Karl Marx.

>>8664018
sorry who is evans?

>>8663847
That explains why neo-fascists (note: not neo-nazis) are more likable than neo-commies

>>8663847
I have no doubt that this is the case for a lot of people.

read nothing before it, read nothing after it

>>8663847
that would explain why it's full of tastelets

you should probably read a few Prussian histories written in the 19th century, in order to drink the kool-aid that Hitler was drinking