Let's have a reactionary literature thread. First question:

File: 薫梢01 by ヨルノトノ.jpg (120KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 600x600px

>>8660661
>reactionary literature

>reactionary
>literature

pick one

>>8660661
>tfw too reactionary for literature

Moldbug
Land
Evola
De maistre
Hegel

>>8660791
Land wants superrobots to wipe out humanity. How is that possibly reactionary?

>>8660824
he had a bad day

>>8660824
He's over-reactionary.

>>8660661
scruton is great
>>8660736
MD5 filtered :^)

>>8660824
He believes he knows that superrobots will wipe out humanity. What's he supposed to do, cry at something he cannot change?
To accept the verdict of power is very reactionary; it's the source of all kingship and hierarchy.
No but really his alliance with the neoreactionaries makes no sense if approached as real; he obviously thinks of them as pets.

>>8662023
neoreactionaries have very similar beliefs to Land about the singularity

I liked his book on music, especially the earlier chapters where he really tries to pin down what it is and how it works before he goes off the deep end railing against pop music at the end.

File: image.jpg (17KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 225x225px

Anyone else here hate women, homosexuals, and nonwhites?

>>8662047
(source needed)

>>8662073
just check out NRx blogs that talk about technology/futurism. They talk about the singularity a lot.

>>8662047
are they in favour of it?

>>8660824
>>8662023

Lands very similar to Hegel in that there is a very right wing reading and very left wing reading possible.

He started very left, as anyone can read in fanged. But he's undeniable right insofar he's found the value of order and is interested in what correct authority would look like.

But dark enlightenment is undeniably right wing as fuck

>>8662610
"Favor" is not as big an issue in Nxr because right wingers are less likely to confuse feelings with thinking.

If you are asking if they are trying to stop it, no.

But they also acknowledge the cathedral getting it's hand on the first pseudo ai as almost instant game over.

>>8662067
>Hate women

No.

>Hate homosexuals

Hate the sin, not the sinner. We call to chastity all those who indulge in the sin of homosexuality. May the Lord be their Shepard in times of great temptations.

>and nonwhites?

No, they're all people. Although a homogeneous society is far superior then a diverse one.

This is the nature of the Reactionary movement. All these Neo-fascist, Neo-Nationalist, and edgey "movements" are not reactionary.

If you want a reactionary experience, attend a Latin Mass friends.