Is there any solid argument against the use of feminist theory to analyze literature? Something specific, as opposed to simply saying that irrelevant theories shouldn't be used to analyze literature. I went into it thinking it would all be bullshit, but I'm beginning to see how it could be useful in understanding our western culture. I do believe that "feminist" theory is a bit of a misnomer though.
>>8651366
>wife01.jpg
imagine if she put that whole turtle in her pussy
poor fucking turtle, so hot
>>8651380
fuck you she's cute, and falling in love with historical depictions of women is the most beautiful tragedy out there
>>8651366
The most accurate critique is that plenty of works have basically no reason to be thought about in terms of gender roles or manifestations. Most people think it's just 'le im triggered' shit though
>>8651391
You mean "the most pathetic shit imaginable," right?
>>8651391
Oh anon, I didn't mean to imply I disagreed at all. Godward is godly.Yours are much higher resolution than I have.
>>8651402
This. It's just completely arbitrary and without reason. Historical context matters more.
Also depends on whether you think the author's dead or not, I guess
>>8651402
But anon gender is in literally everything.
>>8651391
Gautier pls go
>>8651366
here's an argument against it. 99% of all gender theory is already figured out to these niggers, so the most a reading can do is unveil an answer you already know. like most lit crit, totally fucking pointless and should be headshotted/deleted immediate