[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Is there any solid argument against the use of feminist theory

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 3

File: wife01.jpg (522KB, 4000x2642px) Image search: [Google]
wife01.jpg
522KB, 4000x2642px
Is there any solid argument against the use of feminist theory to analyze literature? Something specific, as opposed to simply saying that irrelevant theories shouldn't be used to analyze literature. I went into it thinking it would all be bullshit, but I'm beginning to see how it could be useful in understanding our western culture. I do believe that "feminist" theory is a bit of a misnomer though.
>>
>>8651366
>wife01.jpg
>>
imagine if she put that whole turtle in her pussy

poor fucking turtle, so hot
>>
File: wife04.jpg (2MB, 1444x2755px) Image search: [Google]
wife04.jpg
2MB, 1444x2755px
>>8651380
fuck you she's cute, and falling in love with historical depictions of women is the most beautiful tragedy out there
>>
>>8651366
The most accurate critique is that plenty of works have basically no reason to be thought about in terms of gender roles or manifestations. Most people think it's just 'le im triggered' shit though
>>
>>8651391
You mean "the most pathetic shit imaginable," right?
>>
>>8651391
Oh anon, I didn't mean to imply I disagreed at all. Godward is godly.
Yours are much higher resolution than I have.
>>
>>8651402

This. It's just completely arbitrary and without reason. Historical context matters more.

Also depends on whether you think the author's dead or not, I guess
>>
>>8651402
But anon gender is in literally everything.
>>
>>8651391
Gautier pls go
>>
>>8651366
here's an argument against it. 99% of all gender theory is already figured out to these niggers, so the most a reading can do is unveil an answer you already know. like most lit crit, totally fucking pointless and should be headshotted/deleted immediate
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.