What was his end-game, /lit/?
Having read him, I can now safely say that most people who claim to have done so are either lying or ignoring most of what he said. He seems about as far away from 'meme' philosopher as you can get.
>>8646166
>frog
>'what was his end game lol xD'
>meme
Go away
>>8646166
His end-game was going mad because his philosophy was too fucking autistic.
>>8646166
He didn't have one. The game never ends.
>>8646178
>Implying philosophy can drive you mad
Post-Structuralism, maybe.
>>8646166
I'm not sure Nietzsche had a philosophy per se.
There are so many aphorisms to bear in mind, many of which contradict one another or at least require the consideration of others, that I don't think one can reasonably stick them all coherently together.
There are also big differences between young Nietzsche and old Nietzsche. More than that, you can tell when some of his aphorisms were written in melancholy, whereas with others the ecstasy is clear.
All of this he probably wouldn't disagree with, having hated the 'Will to System' (as seen with most philosophies), but my point remains.