has there been cases where academics draw complex interpretations

>>>/global/rules/3

>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/: ... indecipherable text (example: "lol u tk him 2da bar|?")

Speak clearly, you fucking nerd.

>>8632875
I mean cases where the college professors are clearly making up shit drawing complex interpretations over simple works.

>>8632875
>expecting frog fucks to post decent threads

>>8632862
Yeah, there are thousands of cases of this. it's not even exclusive to literature. I assume you're referring to Freudian interpretations of Cat in the Hat and the like?

>>8632892
I'm not in academia, so I dunno.
I'm watching some bible lecture and they go for hours in fucking genesis.

>>8632862
The easiest low tier example I can give is that people insist that Joker rapes Batgirl and then Batman snaps his neck in The Killing Joke, but the author keeps telling people that that's not the case, which leads to the ridiculous "reader knows more than writer" shit.

>>8632903
You mean to say that Genesis, the creation myth belonging to all Judeo-Christian societies, does not deserve a few scant hours of interpretation?