Does lit care for book covers? I try to get hardcover versions

>>8611183
70s cover art was so great

I buy cheap, usually used books, if they come with a nice cover then it's great, but I don't really care about that.

Sometimes. For LOTR definitely. French editions (not speaking about LOTR only) have good covers even for cheap editions most of the time. Much better than shitty photoshop US/UK novels.
But I like more and more old editions that just have the title with a cool font over a colored background.

>>8611183
usually not except if it is really nice art, not too abstract

File: 234066332_a7909695-d32f-4836-8bb6-4de93ab9385b[1].jpg (48KB, 473x768px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 473x768px

Swedish edition of The Stranger.

Just fuck my cover up.

>>8611205
The thing I can't stand is that there are artists out the butt now willing to work for a sammich but covers have regressed to just font play or generic photo models.

I blame Excel.

>>8611704

in 10 years it'll get censored for killing a turk.

File: IMG_3327.jpg (131KB, 701x526px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 701x526px

who's the dude on the top right?

>>8611183

>caring about the fucking covers on books and not their content

I honestly can't wait for this board to get deleted so you faggots won't know where we are and we will finally be free of your stupid shit.

File: The Two Towers - J.R.R. Tolkien.jpg (471KB, 1200x1599px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 1200x1599px

>>8611183

I had those editions of "The Hobbit" and "The Return of the King". My edition of "The Two Towers" was pic related, though which I liked quite a bit.

To answer your question, I don't really care although I prefer to have a series to be all of the same edition.

>>8611737
>In ten years

>>8611761
autism