Can we discuss this man's ideas? What are the implications of his philosophy on metaphysics and science? Why do you all hate him so much? Is the existence of a-posteriori necessities not an important conceptual breakthrough in philosophy?
>>8608591
What do you want to discuss? His model theory for modal logic is a technical landmark and has basically secured his last name a place in textbooks for centuries to come.
His phil. language is pretty scientistic and not all that great IMO.
All I know is that he blew materialists out, and that's good enough for me
Because ANAL=AUTISTIC philosophy is dumb
>>8608591
LOL I THOUGHT THE PASS WITH WAS AN ACTUAL PRACTICAL JOKE
He's just another shitty Sci fi author. Who gives a shit
>>8608591
humanist rationalists are cancer