ITT things that instantly discredit an author.
>Bible as a primary source in a historical work
Captcha: Crossing the old
>>8597487
What is wrong with the Bible? The Old Testament is a good account of the history of the Kikes.
>>8597487
>Homer taken with qualifications in a historical work
Low hanging fruit, but
>2/3 of the way through self help book
>Suddenly God out of nowhere
>>8597910
Whenever some offers God as a solution or answer to anything, it tells you the person is intellectually lazy.
Agnosticism is the only logical answer.
Short. Staccato. Prose. Just to be. Deep.
>>8598536
An Agnostic is a dodgy faggot who doesn't want to call himself an atheist because of the fedora meme and can't provide his own answer to anything.
>I just don't know anyone could be right LOL XD
>picking a side is just sooooooooooooo difficult
Fence sitting faggot
>>8598593
To say God doesn't exist is as bold a claim as God doesn't. Neither can proven through logic nor empirical experiments. To say God exists or doesn't with conviction is absurd.
>>8598593
Solid views on an unanswerable question is foolish and mad.
>>8598602
>>8598605
>muh proof
science, bitch! :D
>>8598619
>muh faith
Oh, it's one of these chuckle-fucks
>>8597487
Leaving aside whether or not the Bible is true, a work being unreliable doesn't mean it isn't primary source. But of course being such an intellectual you must have already known that.
>>8598602
Atheists don't _BELIEVE_ that God exists. There's a huge difference to say that God does not exist.
>>8598536
If you actually believe in God beforehand, it might help you.
>>8598593
>You must provide answers
>You cannot sit on the fence
>You must throw yourself into a belief you do not believe in
S P O O K E D
>Posts on imageboards
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1923820
AGNOSTIC DEISM MASTER RELIGION.